Adriana Rochier
Research Mentor: Jenna Cobb
Mentor Department: Michigan Innocence Clinic, Law
Author(s): Jenna Cobb, Adriana Rochier
Session: Session 5 (2:00 PM – 2:50 PM)
Presentation Type: Poster 99
Abstract
While there is substantial research about the role that race plays in wrongful convictions, there is little literature about the role of race in post-conviction processes. There is a significant disparity between wrongful conviction rates and exoneration rates. The rate of wrongful conviction is much higher in marginalized communities; however, we do not see the same rates for those who end up exonerated. This research examines how wrongfully convicted individuals are exonerated and the process by which they are deemed innocent. To do this, we analyze the literature and studies on wrongful conviction, post-conviction review, the Innocence Movement, and the role of race in these areas. We examine data from the National Registry of Exonerations, empirical studies, and theoretical analyses to identify patterns. We do not have the final results from the findings yet; however, we expect to make an argument that race significantly impacts whose innocence is recognized and acted upon. Such bias may operate in intake from post-conviction organizations, resource allocation, credibility assessments, and other areas. This research identifies aspects within innocence and post-conviction advocacy where racial bias may influence outcomes, as well as proposes targeted reform to mitigate these effects.
