Ashanti Mirelez
Research Mentor: Devin Judge-Lord
Mentor Department: , Public Policy
Author(s): Ashanti Mirelez
Session: Session 7 (4:00 PM – 4:50 PM)
Presentation Type: Poster 86
Abstract
This project examines how administrative rulemaking shapes U.S. immigration policy and access to immigration benefits. While immigration policy is often associated with congressional legislation, federal agencies play a significant role in determining how laws are implemented through the rulemaking process. This research analyzes major immigration regulations across the Obama, Trump, and Biden administrations, focusing particularly on immigration fee rules and public charge determinations. These policies influence access to immigration benefits by altering costs, procedural requirements, and administrative discretion without changing statutory eligibility. Using qualitative analysis of public comments, agency responses, and final rule texts, the project evaluates how different actors attempt to influence policymaking through the notice-and-comment rulemaking process. Advocacy organizations, legal service providers, and policy groups frequently emphasize equity and access, while administrative actors often prioritize operational capacity and fiscal sustainability. Particular attention is given to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, a largely fee-funded agency with substantial rulemaking authority. The project explores the extent to which public participation affects final regulatory outcomes and raises broader questions about democratic accountability and participation within federal administrative governance.
