My research project is studying the common notions involving sexuality differences and disparities between genders. To gather our data, we monitor surveys taken by paid participants through prolific. Our focus is on the casual relationship scene: we hypothesize that if we control for “anticipated orgasm”, any disparity in casual sex acceptance would dissipate. We use people’s dating apps as a tool for this project. We ask that they review their first potential match and answer a series of questions about how they believe a casual sex encounter would go for them with their first potential match, as well as if they would accept an offer from them. We also ask them questions about their past experiences, opinions regarding sex, and how they’d expect to be perceived by others (if they were to accept an offer). This information helps us better understand the weight of each factor that could contribute to an acceptance or rejection of a casual sex offer. We are also in the process of conducting a cross-cultural study on sexual desire and guilt–making final edits on a survey that will be sent to Americans and Iranians. Working with such a sensitive topic, research ethics are practiced and prioritized. The information we gather is always relevant, and participants’ identities are always protected. Their responses are also completely anonymous. My role in this project is running participants and gathering data. For too long, it has been accepted as a truth that women simply like sex less. The reality is that the prototype “sex” experience is catered heavily to the man. Past experiences and societal pressures are also factors worthy of attention. This project is contributing to the growing body of work critical of the common biological-deterministic approaches and oversimplifications in the understanding of human sexuality.
